This is the class blog for COMM 3307 Social Media at Fordham University's Rose Hill Campus. The students insisted on this name for the blog, the professor is totally innocent in this.
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Class YouTubers
Politics Today
But, new new media can also be very damaging to a campaign. If some unknown truth about the candidate is revealed, it will spread like wildfire throughout the Internet. This would call for serious damage control both through the use of social media as well as conventional mass media. So, I see new new media as being extremely helpful for the public in terms of election. Not only do we have the potential to feel significantly more connected to our candidates, but there is also an ease with which the majority of society can learn about past scandals if they happen to come up during the election period (or after).
However, we must always be careful not to believe anything too quickly and always check stories against other sources. Although the truth has the ability to spread rapidly across the Internet, so do lies.
Obama and Digital Media for his 2008 Campaign
Revolutionizing Politics

Tuesday, March 1, 2011
I Flat Out Hate Twitter
#happy17thbdaybiebs , #isbetterthan , #guttbye , Jensen Ackles ,
Jane Russell , Ana Maria Braga , Justin Drew Bieber , Rubén González , FCAT , TAKS
I don't know whether to blame Youtube or Twitter for Justin Biebers career.
I randomly copy & pasted some tweets:
OMGTeenQuotez I think im afraid to be happy because whenever you do get too happy, something bad always happens
Very useful instruction for the maintenance of teen depression from media outlet OMGTeenQuotez.
Heres a strange one:
From 'The Social Network' to 'Citizen Kane', plenty of great movies have been losers at the Oscars.
Thats from Time Magazine, too. With so many advertisements, so to speak, for links to companies websites in the interest of their site traffic, it makes you wonder what you're really doing on Twitter. That Tweet is an advertisement for an article which has an advertisement, all of which are paid for with your eyeballs.
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Did you see that?
YouTube Success Story: Justin Bieber
Viral Videos
Everyone knows about the "David after Dentist" video or the "Sneezing Panda" and the reason for that is because they are viral videos. No, I'm not saying the videos are spreading viruses, but they are spreading to other people. The reason I have seen many YouTube clips is because of my friends. Many of them will post a YouTube video on their Facebook or even share it with me and that's really how videos become viral. Basically, they're chain letters, except much less annoying.
Rather than just watching the videos, users can also post their own. Many musicians like to post performances for others to watch or even show tutorials for inspiring musicians. Maybe if you're lucky, one of yours videos might become viral worldwide which may even make you famous. Who knows?
YouTube
YouTubin

Monday, February 7, 2011
"Broadcast Yourself"

Honestly, I could not imagine my life today without YouTube. While I was able to live more than most of my life without it, considering it was created in 2005, during the years in which I have had access to it, it seems quite essential. YouTube offers an array of videos, ranging from educational how-to’s to recreational musical videos. The best part of all is that they are FREEEEEEEE! Free for anyone to watch and free for anyone to create! I think YouTube is a great opportunity for individuals to express themselves just like the YouTube trademark which is “Broadcast Yourself.” People can perform different talents and display them on the internet for others to watch and be entertained, sometimes even discovered. For example, the teenage phenomenon Justin Beiber was found on YouTube by Usher. Thinking nothing of it, his videos were posted but nothing was thought to come of this. Surprisingly, his videos were found by the singing sensation Usher who made him a pop superstar. Who would have thought that a few YouTube videos would put him where he is today? Clearly, YouTube can be life changing. While YouTube has not been THAT critical to my life, I enjoy this site and use it daily. I frequently visit YouTube for musical enjoyment such as videos or interviews with my favorite artists. Also, this site is very helpful for many of my classes. It enables me to view different things such as commercials and different experiments for my Psychology classes. Whether it is for fun or for school, YouTube is awesome!
Broadcast Yourself (Sometimes)
Any album you can think of has been uploaded in its entirety. Brand new albums are uploaded many times before they are released commercially. Music videos can easily be found, albeit to a lesser extent. In the past, even television shows were uploaded, but YouTube seems to enforce television copyright more stringently. But why? Why are they such sticklers for television content, but not for music? At least show some consistency.
YouTube’s irregular copyright policies aside, I don’t think music or television content should be uploaded and listened to/viewed for free. Perhaps music is not taken down because it is treated like radio and cannot be downloaded(without a plug-in that is). However, I do believe the use of a video clip or a song should be allowed in videos that users upload. YouTube is a place for people to share the videos they make with the rest of the world. These videos range from short films, spoofs, and babies mispronouncing words like “fire truck.” If someone wants to include a song as background music in their video, they should be allowed to do that. If someone wants to create a music video with clips from their favorite television show, they should be allowed to do that. Using music and video clips in this way contributes to creating new content altogether—effectively a “remix.”

Uploading an entire music album does not change that content in any way. All it does it provide an artist’s work to the public for free, which essentially dissuades people from paying for it. Conversely, remixed content is something entirely new. Music and accompanying sounds are an integral part of a video. Try watching Psycho without the music to see what I mean. Most people are unable to write original music to include in a video’s background, and instead use the scores from movies, games, or other artists. For this type of use, digital copyright law needs to be revised. At the very least YouTube needs to apply some common sense in what they decide is an infringement or not.
I have uploaded multiple videos in the past couple of years. Because I am not a musician, I didn't write any of the music in my videos. Technically, YouTube states that I cannot include any of the music that I did not personally create. If that’s the case, what am I supposed to include? I have always added instrumental background music from movies and games to add to the intensity of a situation or set a mood. In one video in particular, I set the ending credits to an instrumental version of T.I.'s "Big Things Poppin." Because the video was about a nerdy high school math teacher, the song seemed ironic and funny.
YouTube decided that the inclusion of the song was so egregious that they removed all of the audio from the video, rendering it unwatchable. I had to take it down, and re-upload it without the music. Who, I ask, is watching a high school comedy with a mere 5,000 views and deciding that the end credits are a violation of YouTube’s terms of use, but then looks the other way on the Taylor Swift song with 8 million views uploaded by “XoTaYlOrIsMyAnGeL378Xo?” In situations like these I am truly baffled by how YouTube enforces copyright infringement. All I’m asking for is some consistency.
The purpose of YouTube is to broadcast yourself—to display content to the rest of the world. If some people can rip the entire album of an artist's music without remixing it, or changing it in any way, it stands to reason that you should at least be able to use a song or a clip in your video.

The YOUsefulness of YOUtube
It is quite likely that someone who says that they do not use youtube on an almost daily basis is lying. Youtube has definitely become one of the greatest inventions of the Internet in a relatively short amount of time. In my opinion, it is also one of the most accessible websites on the entire Web. Most new technology products manufactured these days come with youtube applications. Many cell phones even come with them. I do question why Apple is so supportive of youtube, with apps on ipods, iphones and ipads, since youtube seems to be making iTunes, one of Apple’s most successful products, nearly obsolete. As has been proven in earlier posts, many people these days simply do not use iTunes anymore, but instead employ youtube for almost all of their music needs. Youtube, at one point, was also contributing to the decline of live television viewing. One used to be able to watch full episodes of television shows, usually in a couple of parts, whenever they wanted on youtube. It is now harder to find complete episodes of shows on youtube because youtube has cracked down on television copyrights. However, I will say that when this was still allowed this was what I, personally, used youtube the most for. I liked it better than going to the network website for a show because on youtube there were no commercial breaks, whereas on a network website there are usually about five or six commercials. Since then, I have become more dependent on youtube for music, how-to videos, viral videos or other videos that have sparked public interest. I have also noticed that greater amounts of other websites often have links to youtube videos. This surprises me a bit because it directs people away from their website to youtube where one can find themselves watching videos or listening to music for hours.